Every figure on these pages is a measured project outcome, not a modeled projection or an industry average. Where a number is an aggregate across several properties, we say so on the page rather than presenting a portfolio average as a per-site result. Where a result depended on conditions specific to that site — existing conduit, an unusually short trench, a utility program that funded make-ready work — that context is in the narrative, because it is what determines whether the same outcome is reachable elsewhere.
We also report the constraint that drove each project. A software renewal deadline, a code compliance date, or a failing charger fleet changes what a good decision looks like, and a result achieved under deadline pressure should not be read as the pace of an unconstrained project.
What is deliberately absent is resident satisfaction scoring, projected revenue, and payback periods built on assumed utilization. Those numbers depend on rate structures, resident EV adoption, and pricing decisions that vary too much between properties to be meaningful as a case study claim.
If your situation resembles one of these projects, the useful comparison points are usually parking type, existing electrical capacity, whether hardware is already installed, and what is setting your timeline. Those four determine most of the scope. Bring them to a conversation and we can tell you which of these projects your site actually looks like.
